Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 24.06.2025 04:06
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Blue Origin performs 12th crewed New Shepard suborbital flight - SpaceNews
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Scientists discover 230 new giant viruses that shape ocean life and health - Phys.org
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What are the differences between INFJ-T and INFJ A?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Thank you.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
The One Habit an Oncologist Recommends Everyone Add by Age 40 - Eat This Not That
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Why does Taylor Swift endorse Harris when Harris supports open borders?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
US-China trade war sideswipes Europe’s carmakers - politico.eu
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What’s next?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.